This is what I do after the kids go to bed and before Forensic Files.
I casually write code.
Claude vs ChatGPT: A Coder's Perspective on LLM Performance
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
In the rapidly evolving world of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent releases from OpenAI's ChatGPT have garnered significant attention. However, when it comes to coding tasks, Anthropic's Claude.ai continues to impress me with its speed and quality of output.
Benchmarking with LeetCode
While LeetCode problems aren't the definitive measure of an AI's coding capabilities (they're pre-designed puzzles, after all), they offer an interesting playground for comparison. Let's dive into a recent example:
3319. K-th Largest Perfect Subtree Size in Binary Tree
Medium
You are given the root of a binary tree and an integer k.
Return an integer denoting the size of the kthlargestperfect binarysubtree, or -1 if it doesn't exist.
A perfect binary tree is a tree where all leaves are on the same level, and every parent has two children.
Example 1:
Input:root = [5,3,6,5,2,5,7,1,8,null,null,6,8], k = 2
Output:3
Explanation:
The roots of the perfect binary subtrees are highlighted in black. Their sizes, in decreasing order are [3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. The 2nd largest size is 3.
Example 2:
Input:root = [1,2,3,4,5,6,7], k = 1
Output:7
Explanation:
The sizes of the perfect binary subtrees in decreasing order are [7, 3, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1]. The size of the largest perfect binary subtree is 7.
Example 3:
Input:root = [1,2,3,null,4], k = 3
Output:-1
Explanation:
The sizes of the perfect binary subtrees in decreasing order are [1, 1]. There are fewer than 3 perfect binary subtrees.
Constraints:
The number of nodes in the tree is in the range [1, 2000].
1 <= Node.val <= 2000
1 <= k <= 1024
My Solution
I tackled this problem using a combination of Post-Order Depth-First Search (PO-DFS) and a Priority Queue. Here are the performance stats:
Runtime: 197 ms
Memory Usage: 103.6 MB
``` Marcelo's Solution:
public class Solution {
public int KthLargestPerfectSubtree(TreeNode root, int k)
{
PriorityQueue pQueue = new PriorityQueue(false, 2500);
Claude.ai consistently outperforms ChatGPT in this and other examples I've tested. Its approach:
Pruned version of PO-DFS
K-min Priority Queue
Performance:
Runtime: 164 ms
Memory Usage: 71.1 MB
``` Claude.ai Solution:
public class Solution
{
private PriorityQueue<int, int> topK;
private int k;
public int KthLargestPerfectSubtree(TreeNode root, int k)
{
this.k = k;
this.topK = new PriorityQueue<int, int>(k, Comparer<int>.Create((a, b) => a - b));
DFS(root);
return topK.Count == k ? topK.Peek() : -1;
}
private int DFS(TreeNode node)
{
if (node == null)
return 0;
int left = DFS(node.left);
int right = DFS(node.right);
if (left == right && IsPowerOfTwoMinusOne(left + right + 1))
{
int size = left + right + 1;
if (topK.Count < k)
{
topK.Enqueue(size, size);
}
else if (size > topK.Peek())
{
topK.Dequeue();
topK.Enqueue(size, size);
}
return size;
}
return -1;
}
private bool IsPowerOfTwoMinusOne(int n)
{
return (n & (n + 1)) == 0;
}
}
```
The Future of AI and Coding
It's astounding to think that we're only in the first decade of LLMs since the groundbreaking "Attention is All You Need" paper. The rapid progress we've seen raises exciting questions:
How will these models evolve in the coming decades?
What impact will they have on software development practices?
How can we best leverage AI assistants in our coding workflows?
As we continue to explore these questions, one thing is clear: the synergy between human creativity and AI capabilities is reshaping the landscape of software development.
This is an interesting example to study the performance characteristics of Golang compared to C# for a very particular case (not generalized though). The same code was written in C# and Golang (literally translated from one to the other). Below you'll be able to see the source code for both. The problem is a simple post-order DFS in a tree-like graph. The code in C# times out (TLE = Time Limited Exceeded). The code in Golang not only works but beats 100% of the other Golang submissions. Take a look the image below: Some potential reasons for the performance gains from Go in this particular example are: 1. Language and Runtime Differences: Go is compiled directly to machine code, while C# typically runs on a virtual machine (CLR). Go has a simpler runtime with less overhead compared to the .NET runtime. Go's garbage collector is designed for low latency, which can lead to better performance in some scenarios. 2. Data Structures: Go's `map` is generally more effi
Last time that I solved a ProjectEuler (PE) problem was in 2015... This is their latest problem as of today: https://projecteuler.net/problem=719 Number Splitting Problem 719 We define an S S -number to be a natural number, n n , that is a perfect square and its square root can be obtained by splitting the decimal representation of n n into 2 or more numbers then adding the numbers. For example, 81 is an S S -number because 81 − − √ = 8 + 1 81 = 8 + 1 . 6724 is an S S -number: 6724 − − − − √ = 6 + 72 + 4 6724 = 6 + 72 + 4 . 8281 is an S S -number: 8281 − − − − √ = 8 + 2 + 81 = 82 + 8 + 1 8281 = 8 + 2 + 81 = 82 + 8 + 1 . 9801 is an S S -number: 9801 − − − − √ = 98 + 0 + 1 9801 = 98 + 0 + 1 . Further we define T ( N ) T ( N ) to be the sum of all S S numbers n ≤ N n ≤ N . You are given T ( 10 4 ) = 41333 T ( 10 4 ) = 41333 . Find T ( 10 12 ) The rules of PE prevent me from disclosing the solution (they are very picky about it, rightfully so), but I can chat abo
Comments
Post a Comment