String concatenation is BAD!!!!

So here was tonight’s problem, from our friend LeetCode: https://leetcode.com/problems/permutation-sequence/description/

The set [1,2,3,…,n] contains a total of n! unique permutations.
By listing and labeling all of the permutations in order,
We get the following sequence (ie, for n = 3):
  1. "123"
  2. "132"
  3. "213"
  4. "231"
  5. "312"
  6. "321"
Given n and k, return the kth permutation sequence.
Note: Given n will be between 1 and 9 inclusive.
It is an interesting one because it asks precisely for the kth permutation sequence. I’m sure there must be a clever way to generate the kth one in O(1) but I decided to generate them all (given the small n) until we get to the kth one. Here was my first implementation: a recursive depth-first search without pruning until we get to the kth sequence:

              public class Solution
              {
                           public string GetPermutation(int n, int k)
                           {
                                         string set = "";

                                         for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
                                                       set += i.ToString();

                                         int index = 0;
                                         string result = "";
                                         bool[] used = new bool[n];

                                         _GetPermutation("", set, ref used, ref index, k, ref result);

                                         return result;
                           }

                           private bool _GetPermutation(string current,
                                                                                                                            string set,
                                                                                                                            ref bool[] used,
                                                                                                                            ref int index,
                                                                                                                            int k,
                                                                                                                            ref string result)
                           {
                                         if (current.Length == set.Length)
                                         {
                                                       index++;
                                                       if (index == k)
                                                       {
                                                                     result = current;
                                                                     return true;
                                                       }

                                                       return false;
                                         }

                                         for (int i = 0; i < set.Length; i++)
                                         {
                                                       if (!used[i])
                                                       {
                                                                     used[i] = true;
                                                                     if (_GetPermutation(current + set[i].ToString(), set, ref used, ref index, k, ref result)) return true;
                                                                     used[i] = false;
                                                       }
                                         }

                                         return false;
                           }
              }

It works, but when I submitted I got the infamous error: Time Limit Exceeded. I had a hunch that the problem was simply in the highlighted line: the code is suffering from an insane number of string concatenations, probably happening tens of thousands of times. Now there will be times when such situation will be near inevitable but certainly it is not the case here. Given that the length of our string never surpasses 9 characters, we can easily change that string to a fixed array, do all the manipulation/indexation with the array, and only leave the string concatenation for the very last operation. It did the trick. Barely, I must say. Passing code is below. Thanks, Marcelo.

              public class Solution
              {
                           public string GetPermutation(int n, int k)
                           {
                                         string set = "";

                                         for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
                                                       set += i.ToString();

                                         int index = 0;
                                         string result = "";
                                         bool[] used = new bool[n];
                                         char[] current = new char[n];
                                         int currentIndex = 0;

                                         _GetPermutation(current, ref currentIndex, set, ref used, ref index, k, ref result);

                                         return result;
                           }

                           private bool _GetPermutation(char[] current,
                                                                                                                             ref int currentIndex,
                                                                                                                            string set,
                                                                                                                            ref bool[] used,
                                                                                                                            ref int index,
                                                                                                                            int k,
                                                                                                                            ref string result)
                           {
                                         if (currentIndex == set.Length)
                                         {
                                                       index++;
                                                       if (index == k)
                                                       {
                                                                     result = "";
                                                                     foreach (char c in current)
                                                                                  result += c.ToString();
                                                                     return true;
                                                       }

                                                       return false;
                                         }

                                         for (int i = 0; i < set.Length; i++)
                                         {
                                                       if (!used[i])
                                                       {
                                                                     used[i] = true;
                                                                     current[currentIndex++] = set[i];
                                                                     if (_GetPermutation(current, ref currentIndex, set, ref used, ref index, k, ref result)) return true;
                                                                     currentIndex--;
                                                                     used[i] = false;
                                                       }
                                         }

                                         return false;
                           }
              }



Comments

  1. So true, Marcelo! :) Concatenation is one of the first enemies that functional programmers discover, since beginners usually implement recursive list traversal using concatenation, which results in a very unfortunate O(N^2) time complexity. On top of expensive copying involved in concatenation, allocations are even a bigger problem, especially for managed languages, since it causes garbage collector pressure.

    Since I'm somewhat sleepy right now, I decided to cheat and use a built-in C++ function to solve this problem (code is reuse is good, isn't it? :)

    class Solution {
    public:
    string getPermutation(int n, int k) {
    string label(n, '\0');
    for (int i = 1; i <= n; ++i) label[i-1] = '0' + i;
    for (int i = 1; i < k; ++i) next_permutation(label.begin(), label.end());
    return label;
    }
    };

    Thank you!
    Taras

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sooo cooool!!! Next_permutation: very nice! https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11483060/stdnext-permutation-implementation-explanation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Haha, C++ is perfect for cheaters like me :D

      Delete
  3. I really appreciate your professional approach.These are pieces of very useful information that will be of great use for me in future.

    ซอมบี้

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Golang vs. C#: performance characteristics (simple case study)

Claude vs ChatGPT: A Coder's Perspective on LLM Performance

ProjectEuler Problem 719 (some hints, but no spoilers)