2^(3^(4^(5^(6^(7^(8^9)))))) - Part I

-
The problem comes from the IBM Ponder This October 2014 Challenge:

http://domino.research.ibm.com/Comm/wwwr_ponder.nsf/Challenges/October2014.html

What are the last 10 decimal digits of 2^(3^(4^(5^(6^(7^(8^9))))))?

This is a big number.
If you just take 8^9, you'll end up with 134,217,728. Now try raising, say, 2 to the power of this number, or 2^134,217,728. For comparison sake, the number of atoms in the universe is less than 2^324.

The problem is asking for the last 10 decimal digits, so that should have been an important clue. It should have rang a bell for two key ideas behind solving this problem:
1) Modular Arithmetic: to get the last 3 digits of 1234, all I have to do is calculate 1234%(10^3)
2) Big Integers. Try Binging for Big Integers in C#.

Solution in the next post. Have fun!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Golang vs. C#: performance characteristics (simple case study)

-
Image
This is an interesting example to study the performance characteristics of Golang compared to C# for a very particular case (not generalized though).  The same code was written in C# and Golang (literally translated from one to the other). Below you'll be able to see the source code for both. The problem is a simple post-order DFS in a tree-like graph. The code in C# times out (TLE = Time Limited Exceeded). The code in Golang not only works but beats 100% of the other Golang submissions. Take a look the image below: Some potential reasons for the performance gains from Go in this particular example are: 1. Language and Runtime Differences:    Go is compiled directly to machine code, while C# typically runs on a virtual machine (CLR).    Go has a simpler runtime with less overhead compared to the .NET runtime.    Go's garbage collector is designed for low latency, which can lead to better performance in some scenarios. 2. Data Structures:    Go's `map` is generally more effi
Read more

Claude vs ChatGPT: A Coder's Perspective on LLM Performance

-
Image
In the rapidly evolving world of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent releases from OpenAI's ChatGPT have garnered significant attention. However, when it comes to coding tasks, Anthropic's Claude.ai continues to impress me with its speed and quality of output. Benchmarking with LeetCode While LeetCode problems aren't the definitive measure of an AI's coding capabilities (they're pre-designed puzzles, after all), they offer an interesting playground for comparison. Let's dive into a recent example: The Problem K-th Largest Perfect Subtree Size in Binary Tree - LeetCode 3319. K-th Largest Perfect Subtree Size in Binary Tree Medium 36 6 Add to List Share You are given the  root  of a  binary tree  and an integer  k . Return an integer denoting the size of the  k th   largest   perfect binary   subtree , or  -1  if it doesn't exist. A  perfect binary tree  is a tree where all leaves are on the same level, and every parent has two children.   Example 1: Input:  
Read more

ProjectEuler Problem 719 (some hints, but no spoilers)

-
Image
Last time that I solved a ProjectEuler (PE) problem was in 2015... This is their latest problem as of today:  https://projecteuler.net/problem=719 Number Splitting        Problem 719 We define an  S S -number to be a natural number,  n n , that is a perfect square and its square root can be obtained by splitting the decimal representation of  n n  into 2 or more numbers then adding the numbers. For example, 81 is an  S S -number because  81 − − √ = 8 + 1 81 = 8 + 1 . 6724 is an  S S -number:  6724 − − − − √ = 6 + 72 + 4 6724 = 6 + 72 + 4 . 8281 is an  S S -number:  8281 − − − − √ = 8 + 2 + 81 = 82 + 8 + 1 8281 = 8 + 2 + 81 = 82 + 8 + 1 . 9801 is an  S S -number:  9801 − − − − √ = 98 + 0 + 1 9801 = 98 + 0 + 1 . Further we define  T ( N ) T ( N )  to be the sum of all  S S  numbers  n ≤ N n ≤ N . You are given  T ( 10 4 ) = 41333 T ( 10 4 ) = 41333 . Find  T ( 10 12 ) The rules of PE prevent me from disclosing the solution (they are very picky about it, rightfully so), but I can chat abo
Read more