Unguarded Cells: grid, hash and a linear approach
The problem this weekend asks for the number of cells that are not guarded. Since the limits of the grid are in the 10^5 range, we're then looking for a O(N) solution.
First, it would be wise to add the positions of the guards and the walls in handy hash-tables. Relatively simple.
After that, think this way: if you scan the grid in a left-to-right analyzing each row, you can increment the cells that are not reached by a guard in that row from left to right. Any cell that has a 1 at the end of this operation is free from guards in that row from left to right.
Now apply the same approach in the other 3 directions: right to left, top down and bottoms-up. By doing so, at the very end, any cell that reaches the number 4 is free from any guard. And that's your answer.
Thus, this would be a 4*m*n, and since m*n<=10^5 (as per the constraint), then the solution becomes O(4*10^5), which is very tractable and considered linear in this case. Code is down below, cheers, ACC.
2257. Count Unguarded Cells in the Grid
Medium
You are given two integers m
and n
representing a 0-indexed m x n
grid. You are also given two 2D integer arrays guards
and walls
where guards[i] = [rowi, coli]
and walls[j] = [rowj, colj]
represent the positions of the ith
guard and jth
wall respectively.
A guard can see every cell in the four cardinal directions (north, east, south, or west) starting from their position unless obstructed by a wall or another guard. A cell is guarded if there is at least one guard that can see it.
Return the number of unoccupied cells that are not guarded.
Example 1:
Input: m = 4, n = 6, guards = [[0,0],[1,1],[2,3]], walls = [[0,1],[2,2],[1,4]] Output: 7 Explanation: The guarded and unguarded cells are shown in red and green respectively in the above diagram. There are a total of 7 unguarded cells, so we return 7.
Example 2:
Input: m = 3, n = 3, guards = [[1,1]], walls = [[0,1],[1,0],[2,1],[1,2]] Output: 4 Explanation: The unguarded cells are shown in green in the above diagram. There are a total of 4 unguarded cells, so we return 4.
Constraints:
1 <= m, n <= 105
2 <= m * n <= 105
1 <= guards.length, walls.length <= 5 * 104
2 <= guards.length + walls.length <= m * n
guards[i].length == walls[j].length == 2
0 <= rowi, rowj < m
0 <= coli, colj < n
- All the positions in
guards
andwalls
are unique.
public int CountUnguarded(int m, int n, int[][] guards, int[][] walls) { int[][] count = new int[m][]; for (int i = 0; i < count.Length; i++) count[i] = new int[n]; Hashtable guardsHash = new Hashtable(); for (int i = 0; i < guards.Length; i++) { long key = guards[i][0] * (100000 + 5) + guards[i][1]; guardsHash.Add(key, true); } Hashtable wallsHash = new Hashtable(); for (int i = 0; i < walls.Length; i++) { long key = walls[i][0] * (100000 + 5) + walls[i][1]; wallsHash.Add(key, true); } //L->R for (int r = 0; r < m; r++) { bool lastIsGuard = false; for (int c = 0; c < n; c++) { long key = r * (100000 + 5) + c; if (guardsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = true; } else if (wallsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = false; } else if (!lastIsGuard) { count[r][c]++; } } } //R->L for (int r = 0; r < m; r++) { bool lastIsGuard = false; for (int c = n - 1; c >= 0; c--) { long key = r * (100000 + 5) + c; if (guardsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = true; } else if (wallsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = false; } else if (!lastIsGuard) { count[r][c]++; } } } //T->B for (int c = 0; c < n; c++) { bool lastIsGuard = false; for (int r = 0; r < m; r++) { long key = r * (100000 + 5) + c; if (guardsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = true; } else if (wallsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = false; } else if (!lastIsGuard) { count[r][c]++; } } } //B->T int retVal = 0; for (int c = 0; c < n; c++) { bool lastIsGuard = false; for (int r = m - 1; r >= 0; r--) { long key = r * (100000 + 5) + c; if (guardsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = true; } else if (wallsHash.ContainsKey(key)) { lastIsGuard = false; } else if (!lastIsGuard) { count[r][c]++; if (count[r][c] == 4) retVal++; } } } return retVal; }
Comments
Post a Comment